light of this understanding. (2) Calvin holds that man’s dominion over the earth is not part of the image of God. Yet, as we have seen, this dominion is presented as an aspect of the image in Genesis 1:26. (3) Calvin does not do full justice to man’s having been created male and female as an essential aspect of the image of God, and to the implications of this aspect for our understanding of the image. We turn now to the views of a more recent theologian, Karl Barth, often called the father
Page 49